<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discuss this: Fewer young people reading, and what it means for the future.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booklifenow.com/2010/01/discuss-this-fewer-young-people-reading-and-what-it-means-for-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booklifenow.com/2010/01/discuss-this-fewer-young-people-reading-and-what-it-means-for-the-future/</link>
	<description>Strategies and Survival Tips for the 21st-Century Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:51:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD McDonnell</title>
		<link>http://booklifenow.com/2010/01/discuss-this-fewer-young-people-reading-and-what-it-means-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>JD McDonnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booklifenow.com/?p=353#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Maybe the problem is simply asking kids to identify themselves as &quot;readers.&quot; My nephew is one of the biggest nerds in the world, he just doesn&#039;t know it yet. He reads graphic novels from Scholastic Books and enjoys them, but I doubt he would do something so uncool as identify himself as a &quot;reader,&quot; despite the influence of his very nerdy uncle.

Do I believe the children are the future (cue Whitney Houston now) of reading? They can&#039;t help but be, and they&#039;ll do some reading but not significantly more or less. 

One nice thing about the book as a business model. Unlike a video game or movie or television show, is that it doesn&#039;t require a large number of paid people to produce a book, likewise it doesn&#039;t require as large a number of sales to remain afloat or be dubbed successful. Stephen King sells a million copies in the US and it&#039;s something to brag about, even though it only represents a fraction of a percent of the total population of the country. There are three hundred million people in America, and some books only sell a few thousand copies, yet their authors continued to be published over and over. 

So long as books manage to keep a low overhead I think they will stick around in one form or another for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the problem is simply asking kids to identify themselves as &#8220;readers.&#8221; My nephew is one of the biggest nerds in the world, he just doesn&#8217;t know it yet. He reads graphic novels from Scholastic Books and enjoys them, but I doubt he would do something so uncool as identify himself as a &#8220;reader,&#8221; despite the influence of his very nerdy uncle.</p>
<p>Do I believe the children are the future (cue Whitney Houston now) of reading? They can&#8217;t help but be, and they&#8217;ll do some reading but not significantly more or less. </p>
<p>One nice thing about the book as a business model. Unlike a video game or movie or television show, is that it doesn&#8217;t require a large number of paid people to produce a book, likewise it doesn&#8217;t require as large a number of sales to remain afloat or be dubbed successful. Stephen King sells a million copies in the US and it&#8217;s something to brag about, even though it only represents a fraction of a percent of the total population of the country. There are three hundred million people in America, and some books only sell a few thousand copies, yet their authors continued to be published over and over. </p>
<p>So long as books manage to keep a low overhead I think they will stick around in one form or another for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Crowshit</title>
		<link>http://booklifenow.com/2010/01/discuss-this-fewer-young-people-reading-and-what-it-means-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Crowshit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booklifenow.com/?p=353#comment-457</guid>
		<description>I can see the day when most kids read off their cellphone or PSP or Nintendo or ipod or whatever gadget they got in their pocket, cause that&#039;s where they find stories that are relevant to them.  Digital publishing takes a large chunk of the cost of publishing away, there&#039;s still costs, but you can publish to any number of sites for nothing, granted smashwords and the wattpad and the like don&#039;t carry the same regard as having your book on the kindle library or whatever, the possibility is there.  
If I had a better memory I would link to the article i saw that showed that kids actually read more today than before, just the reading they do is in the form of txt messages or signs or other non-book forms.  This needs to be utilized by writers more than it is.  Actual printed books risk becoming like vinyl albums, that is things that grandma has got boxes and boxes of and nobody knows how to use anymore.  I mean, the metaphor is not complete, but the risk is there, not in ten years, but twenty?  who could really predict with any accuracy where literature will be when we have the option of having brain implants and all that the future teases us with?
Is that too much? I should blog again rather than fill up everyones else&#039;s forums with my rants...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the day when most kids read off their cellphone or PSP or Nintendo or ipod or whatever gadget they got in their pocket, cause that&#8217;s where they find stories that are relevant to them.  Digital publishing takes a large chunk of the cost of publishing away, there&#8217;s still costs, but you can publish to any number of sites for nothing, granted smashwords and the wattpad and the like don&#8217;t carry the same regard as having your book on the kindle library or whatever, the possibility is there.<br />
If I had a better memory I would link to the article i saw that showed that kids actually read more today than before, just the reading they do is in the form of txt messages or signs or other non-book forms.  This needs to be utilized by writers more than it is.  Actual printed books risk becoming like vinyl albums, that is things that grandma has got boxes and boxes of and nobody knows how to use anymore.  I mean, the metaphor is not complete, but the risk is there, not in ten years, but twenty?  who could really predict with any accuracy where literature will be when we have the option of having brain implants and all that the future teases us with?<br />
Is that too much? I should blog again rather than fill up everyones else&#8217;s forums with my rants&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassie Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://booklifenow.com/2010/01/discuss-this-fewer-young-people-reading-and-what-it-means-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassie Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booklifenow.com/?p=353#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I think this is another indication that digital publishing is the wave of the future. Kids not reading is not a new issue. It has been discussed for decades.

The issue now is how to make digital publishing affordable and exciting for both the children and their parents. It will be interesting to see what others think.

Cassie Armstrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is another indication that digital publishing is the wave of the future. Kids not reading is not a new issue. It has been discussed for decades.</p>
<p>The issue now is how to make digital publishing affordable and exciting for both the children and their parents. It will be interesting to see what others think.</p>
<p>Cassie Armstrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 284/285 objects using disk: basic

Served from: booklifenow.com @ 2012-02-09 16:51:24 -->
